Real World Appeal
ResearchSeptember 13, 202614 min read

Male loneliness statistics: what the data says about the male loneliness epidemic

Male loneliness statistics explained: men and women report similar loneliness, while friendship and emotional-support patterns have changed.

A man sitting alone by a café window, looking outside
Photo: Sóc Năng Động

You have probably seen the headline: men are living through a loneliness epidemic. If you are a young man who feels cut off, it reads like a diagnosis. If you are writing about it, you need a number that survives a fact-check.

The short version: on most large measures, men and women report similar levels of loneliness. What changed for men is friendship and support. 15% of US men reported no close friends in 2021, versus 3% in 1990, a real shift, but one that compares a phone poll with an online survey.

This page sorts the numbers that hold from the ones that get misquoted, and says what each one actually measured.

Key numbers

  • g = 0.07 overall sex difference in loneliness across 751 effect sizes and 399,798 people. Source
  • 24% vs 24% of men and women worldwide felt very or fairly lonely in the Meta-Gallup study. Source
  • 15% vs 3% of US men reported no close friends in 2021 versus 1990; the comparison has a phone-versus-online caveat. Source
  • 21% vs 41% of men and women said they received emotional support from a friend in the past week. Source
  • 25% vs 15%: US men aged 15–34 felt lonely “a lot of the previous day” versus the OECD median for younger men. Source
  • 20 minutes a day: men’s time with friends fell by that amount from 2003 to 2019. Source
  • 1.26 vs 1.50: the odds ratio for loneliness and mortality (2015) versus the odds ratio for survival with stronger social relationships (2010). Source Source

Table of contents

Is there really a male loneliness epidemic?

There is a social-connection problem, but broad evidence does not show a male-only loneliness epidemic. A 2019 meta-analysis found an almost zero sex difference; probability surveys put men and women close together.

Social isolation is a lack of relationships, roles, memberships or frequent interaction. A person can be isolated without feeling lonely, or lonely among people; merging statistics creates false certainty. The Surgeon General’s definitions and the National Academies summary make the distinction explicit.

MeasureMenWomen
Felt very or fairly lonely, worldwide24%24%
Estimated lonely, WHO global estimate15.4%16.1%
No close friends, US 202115%10%
Got emotional support from a friend last week, US 202121%41%
Shared personal feelings with a friend last week, US 202130%48%

The BBC Loneliness Experiment found greater loneliness in men than in women among 46,054 self-selected participants from 237 countries and territories. It is not a representative probability survey, so it should sit beside—not erase—broader measures. Pew’s 2024 US survey found 16% felt lonely or isolated all or most of the time, with no significant male-female difference.

The data support a connection problem, not a universal male crisis.

How many men have no close friends?

The most cited US figure is 15%: men reporting no close friends in 2021, compared with 3% in 1990. “15% of men today” is inaccurate: the latest figure is from May 2021, and the surveys used different modes.

The 2021 American Perspectives Survey interviewed 2,019 US adults via the probability-based Ipsos KnowledgePanel. The 1990 baseline was a Gallup telephone poll; the newer survey was online. The report warns phone respondents may have under-reported no friends or inflated friend counts, making the change uncertain. Read the survey report and methodology.

The surrounding figures still tell a consistent story: men with at least six close friends fell from 55% in 1990 to 27% in 2021. Women’s figures were 41% and 24%; 10% reported no close friends in 2021. One in five unmarried US men reported no close friends.

“Close friend” is self-defined, and one friend was not associated with less loneliness or isolation than none in the Survey Center analysis.

A man sitting alone on a bench by a lake
Photo: Alex / Pexels

The 15% figure is survey data, not a current census; pair it with the mode-change warning.

Are young men the loneliest group?

Young men are unusually lonely in one US series, but not the loneliest group everywhere. Gallup found 25% of US men aged 15–34 felt lonely “a lot of the previous day” in 2023–2024, versus 18% of young women and 18% nationally.

The US was Gallup’s largest OECD gap: 25% for young men versus 17% for other adults. It was one of three countries where young men were lonelier than other adults. Across OECD countries, the median for younger men was 15%, close to the overall median of 16%.

Meta-Gallup found 27% of adults aged 19–29 worldwide very or fairly lonely, versus 17% of adults aged 65 and older. Pew found adults under 50 more likely to often feel lonely than adults 50 and older, 22% versus 9%.

In Great Britain in March 2022, the Office for National Statistics found 24% of men aged 16–29 reported feeling lonely often, always or some of the time, compared with 40% of women in that age group. AIBM reports that among US teens in 2023, 25% of boys versus 44% of girls often felt lonely, with the caveat that this is a secondary account of Monitoring the Future data.

US young men deserve attention, but “young men everywhere are the loneliest” is not what the data say.

Are men spending less time with friends?

Yes: the male-specific change is contact and support, not self-reported loneliness. American Time Use Survey analysis found men’s time with friends fell 20 minutes from 2003 to 2019, versus 16 minutes for women; time alone rose 29 minutes versus 12 for women.

The steepest drop was among 15–24-year-olds: time with friends fell by 62 minutes a day. From 2003 to 2020, in-person friend time fell from 60 minutes a day to 20 for Americans aged 15 and older, and from roughly 150 minutes to 40 for 15–24-year-olds. The 2020 endpoint is a pandemic year; time use is not felt loneliness. How to be more social focuses on rebuilding contact.

Only 21% of men, versus 41% of women, received emotional support from a friend in the past week. Men were less likely to share feelings with a friend, 30% versus 48%, or turn to one for emotional support, 38% versus 54%.

The gap isn’t in how lonely men feel. It’s in where men turn. Young men turning to friends first fell from 45% in 1990 to 22% in 2021; 36% said they turned to parents first.

Two friends clinking beer glasses in a bar
Photo: Ketut Subiyanto / Pexels

Men’s friendship time was slightly higher than women’s; the sharper finding is the decline and support gap.

Why do loneliness estimates range from 16% to 50%?

The estimates disagree because surveys ask different questions and use different instruments. Feeling lonely “all or most of the time” is not interchangeable with a loneliness scale or sponsor-selected cut-off.

SurveyShare reporting lonelinessWhat it asked and who
Pew 202416%US adults saying lonely or isolated all or most of the time
Gallup Well-Being Index 202420%US adults feeling loneliness a lot of the day yesterday
Harvard MCC 202421%US adults lonely frequently or almost all the time in past 30 days
Meta-Gallup 2022–2324% worldwideAges 15+ feeling very or fairly lonely
WHO 202515.8% worldwideModelled estimate from 23 datasets in 153 countries, 2014–2023
Cigna 2018 indexaverage score 44 on a 20–80 scaleUCLA-scale-based online survey of 20,000+ US adults

The “half of Americans are lonely” line in the Surgeon General’s advisory cites a Cigna report and a Cigna-authored panel survey, both built on the UCLA Loneliness Scale rather than one direct question. Cigna’s 2018 average was 44 on a 20–80 scale; the report found no major male-female difference.

The 2021 Harvard report’s 61% came from a preliminary Amazon Mechanical Turk survey of 935 people during the pandemic; its 2024 successor found 21% in a different survey.

Disagreement is a measurement problem, not proof one side is lying.

Is loneliness as deadly as smoking 15 cigarettes a day?

No precise claim supports “loneliness equals 15 cigarettes.” Social connection is associated with survival, but the comparison concerns lacking social connection, says “up to 15,” and does not establish causal equivalence.

The 2010 meta-analysis covered 148 studies and 308,849 participants. It reported an odds ratio of 1.50 for survival with stronger social relationships, including marital status, network size, integration and support. Figure 6 juxtaposed the estimate with separate meta-analyses, including a bar labelled smoking under 15 cigarettes daily. It was not a head-to-head trial, and the full text does not contain “15 cigarettes.” See the meta-analysis and Figure 6.

The Surgeon General’s advisory says the impact of social disconnection is similar to smoking up to 15 cigarettes a day, but its footnote cites a 2017 paper whose author manuscript contains no “cigarette” wording. The comparison comes from the 2010 figure; the author explains it as “lacking social connection,” not loneliness. Cigna rewrote it as “loneliness has the same impact” and dropped “up to.”

Loneliness had an odds ratio of 1.26 in the 2015 meta-analysis, versus 1.29 for social isolation. These observational associations do not prove loneliness causes a fixed number of deaths. The National Academies judged evidence for loneliness and mortality not yet approaching evidence for isolation. The primary health evidence is here.

Social disconnection matters; precision matters when analogy sounds medical.

Which loneliness statistics get misquoted most?

The recurring errors swap loneliness for social connection, turn a dated survey into a current estimate, or confuse a discussion network with close friends.

  • “Loneliness equals 15 cigarettes.” Lacking social connection is comparable to smoking up to 15 cigarettes per day. The author’s wording is clearer than the shorthand.
  • “Lonely people are 50% more likely to die prematurely.” The 2010 paper reported 50% greater survival likelihood for stronger social relationships, not that loneliness caused 50% higher mortality. The Conversation’s wording shows the mix-up.
  • “The average number of close friends fell from 2.94.” That 2.94 figure is a 1985 GSS mean number of confidants, not a 1990 count of close friends. The statistics blog example shows why the year and construct matter.
  • “A quarter of Americans have no confidant.” The GSS finding was likely an interviewer artifact, not a clean trend. Fischer’s analysis and Paik and Sanchagrin explain the problem.
  • “Loneliness causes 871,000 deaths.” WHO describes this as a modelled attributable-mortality estimate for 2014–2019 and says loneliness may be responsible—not that a death certificate records it as the cause. WHO’s report supplies the qualification.

How to cite this page

Suggested citation: Real World Appeal. “Male loneliness statistics: what the data says about the male loneliness epidemic.” realworldappeal.com, September 2026. https://realworldappeal.com/blog/male-loneliness-statistics

Primary sources are linked throughout so writers, journalists and students can cite them directly. Data retrieval date: 13 September 2026.

The bottom line

The responsible answer is neither “men are fine” nor “men alone are in an epidemic.” Broad measures usually find similar loneliness by sex, while friendship time, emotional disclosure and first-line support have weakened more sharply for men—and young men are a genuine US outlier.

The gap isn’t in how lonely men feel. It’s in where men turn. Feeling lonely is common in both sexes and at every age, which makes it a solvable situation rather than a verdict on you. Repeated, low-stakes contact with the same people does more than doom-scrolling statistics; if anxiety is the barrier, start with how to make small talk.

If part of the hesitation is worry about how you come across to new people, Real World Appeal’s free photo read can describe a photo’s first impression before any payment decision. It is not a clinical or scientific instrument and does not decide your social future. In the US, anyone in crisis can call or text 988 for the Suicide & Crisis Lifeline. SAMHSA’s official page has the service details.

Sources

  • Maes M, Qualter P, Vanhalst J, Van den Noortgate W, Goossens L. (2019). Gender Differences in Loneliness across the Lifespan: A Meta–Analysis. European Journal of Personality, 33(6), 642–654. Linked source
  • Gallup and Meta. (2023). Almost a Quarter of the World Feels Lonely. Gallup opinion article. Linked source
  • Survey Center on American Life. (2021). American Men Suffer a Friendship Recession. Linked source
  • Survey Center on American Life (Cox D.). (2021). The State of American Friendship: Change, Challenges, and Loss. American Perspectives Survey report. Linked source
  • Gallup. (2025). Younger Men in the U.S. Among the Loneliest in West. Gallup News. Linked source
  • Kannan VD, Veazie PJ. (2023). US trends in social isolation, social engagement, and companionship—nationally and by age, sex, race/ethnicity, family income, and work hours, 2003–2020. SSM - Population Health, 21, 101331. Linked source
  • Office of the U.S. Surgeon General (HHS). (2023). Our Epidemic of Loneliness and Isolation: The U.S. Surgeon General’s Advisory on the Healing Effects of Social Connection and Community. Advisory. Linked source
  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2020). Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults: Opportunities for the Health Care System. Summary. NCBI Bookshelf. Linked source
  • Pew Research Center. (2025). Men, Women and Social Connections. Report. Linked source
  • Barreto M, Victor C, Hammond C, Eccles A, Richins MT, Qualter P. (2021). Loneliness around the world: Age, gender, and cultural differences in loneliness. Personality and Individual Differences, 169, 110066. Linked source
  • Office for National Statistics. (2022). Trends in personal wellbeing and loneliness by age and sex. Ad hoc dataset 14409. Linked source
  • American Institute for Boys and Men. (2025). Male loneliness and isolation: What the data shows. Research brief. Linked source
  • Russell DW. (1996). UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66(1), 20–40. Linked source
  • Cigna / Ipsos. (2018). Cigna U.S. Loneliness Index (2018 full report). Company report. Linked source
  • Making Caring Common, Harvard Graduate School of Education. (2024). Loneliness in America: Just the Tip of the Iceberg? Brief report. Linked source
  • Making Caring Common, Harvard Graduate School of Education. (2021). Loneliness in America: How the Pandemic Has Deepened an Epidemic of Loneliness. Report. Linked source
  • Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Layton JB. (2010). Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review. PLoS Medicine, 7(7), e1000316. Linked source
  • Holt-Lunstad J, Robles TF, Sbarra DA. (2017). Advancing social connection as a public health priority in the United States. American Psychologist, 72(6), 517–530. Linked source
  • Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Baker M, Harris T, Stephenson D. (2015). Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(2), 227–237. Linked source
  • Dr. Julianne Holt-Lunstad. (n.d., accessed 2026-09-13). 15 Cigarettes. Linked source
  • The Conversation. (2023). Is loneliness really as damaging to your health as smoking 15 cigarettes a day? News analysis. Linked source
  • McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Brashears ME. (2006). Social Isolation in America: Changes in Core Discussion Networks over Two Decades. American Sociological Review, 71(3), 353–375. Linked source
  • Fischer CS. (2009). The 2004 GSS Finding of Shrunken Social Networks: An Artifact? American Sociological Review, 74(4), 657–669. Linked source
  • Paik A, Sanchagrin K. (2013). Social Isolation in America: An Artifact. American Sociological Review, 78(3), 339–360. Linked source
  • mindfuse.io. (2026). Friendship statistics. Blog page. Linked source
  • World Health Organization. (2025). From loneliness to social connection – charting a path to healthier societies: report of the WHO Commission on Social Connection. WHO report. Linked source
  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2026). 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline. Official web page. Linked source

Frequently asked questions

Is male loneliness really an epidemic?

Something real is happening in friendship and social contact, but large measures usually find similar loneliness among men and women. The social connection data points more clearly to a support gap than to a men-only loneliness crisis.

What percentage of men have no close friends?

The Survey Center on American Life reported that 15% of US men had no close friends in 2021, compared with 3% in 1990. The comparison mixes a telephone poll with an online survey, so the fivefold increase needs that caveat.

Are men lonelier than women?

Usually, large probability surveys find no meaningful sex gap. Men can still have fewer emotionally supportive friendships, which is different from reporting more loneliness; social anxiety statistics help explain why contact and disclosure can diverge.

Is loneliness as bad as smoking 15 cigarettes a day?

That wording is too strong. The comparison concerns lacking social connection broadly and says up to 15 cigarettes, while a loneliness-specific mortality estimate is smaller; why social connection matters is the healthier frame.

Why are young men so lonely?

Young men are an outlier in some US data, not a universal Western pattern. Friendship time has fallen sharply among young people, and the practical response is repeated, low-pressure contact with the same people; how to overcome social anxiety can help with the first step.

Test your own first-impression score

About a minute: four quick picks (height, weight, body type, training), then your photos. Your score and the read are free, no card — a free account (email + code) opens them.

Start the test

Related reading